Legal assistance with trademark oppositions, appeals against refusals and invalidation or revocation proceedings in Albania, representing applicants and rights holders before the DPPI, its appeal structures and the courts.Legal assistance with trademark oppositions, appeals against refusals and invalidation or revocation proceedings in Albania, representing applicants and rights holders before the DPPI, its appeal structures and the courts.
Scope, fee and timing are confirmed before work begins.

Matter-specific legal support
We review the facts, current stage and available documents before defining the legal work.
The proposed work, fee and indicative timing are confirmed in writing before work begins.
At a glance
Trademark watching to identify potentially conflicting new applications
Preparing and filing oppositions against conflicting trademark applications before the DPPI
Responding to oppositions filed against the client's own application
Appeals against refusals and other adverse decisions before the competent appeal bodies
Invalidation and revocation actions, including non-use arguments where relevant
How it starts
Tell us the facts, parties, current stage and documents you already have.
We confirm the work, deliverables, fee and expected timing.
We complete the agreed work and communicate the findings or next steps.
Your matter
We review the initial information and reply with the appropriate scope, fee and next step.
Send your matterQuestions
In certain cases, yes. Holders of earlier rights may oppose conflicting applications within the statutory deadline, so the application and the grounds should be reviewed quickly.
Refusals may often be challenged before the competent appeal bodies and, in certain cases, further before the courts. The decision, the grounds and the deadlines must be reviewed first.
Keep the notification, note the date and seek a legal review before responding. The defense strategy depends on the grounds invoked and the evidence available on both sides.
In certain cases, yes — for example where earlier rights or other legal grounds are at issue, or where a mark has not been genuinely used. Each case requires a review of the registration and the evidence.
Yes. We can set up trademark watching so that potentially conflicting applications are identified while an opposition is still possible.
Not every intellectual property dispute in Albania starts with counterfeiting. Many are decided earlier — at the registration stage — through oppositions against conflicting applications, appeals against refusals and requests to invalidate or revoke existing registrations.
Andoni Law & Tax represents Albanian and international applicants and rights holders in these contentious registration proceedings, primarily before the General Directorate of Industrial Property (DPPI), its appeal structures and, where necessary, the competent courts.
These procedures are governed by strict statutory deadlines. Whether you want to block a conflicting application or defend your own, the file, the grounds and the dates should be reviewed as early as possible.
We handle both sides of contentious registration proceedings — attacking conflicting rights and defending the client's own applications and registrations.
Typical work includes:
This service is typically relevant when:
Opposition and appeal proceedings are decided on paper: the grounds invoked, the evidence filed and the deadlines met largely determine the outcome. A missed deadline or an incomplete submission can rarely be repaired later.
The strategic dimension matters as much as the procedural one. Whether to oppose, negotiate a coexistence, limit the goods and services or escalate to court depends on the strength of the earlier right, the market situation and the cost the client is willing to carry. We help clients take these decisions on an informed basis, after reviewing the file.
We examine the application or decision at issue, the notification dates and the applicable deadlines, so that no procedural option is lost while the strategy is being decided.
We analyze the strength of the earlier rights, the similarity of the signs and goods, the available proof of use and any weaknesses on either side.
We draft the opposition, response, appeal or invalidation request and file it with the competent body together with the supporting evidence.
We monitor the procedure, respond to communications and additional submissions, and represent the client in hearings where they take place.
Depending on the decision, we advise on settlement, coexistence, further appeal before the courts or adjustments to the client's filing strategy.
In certain cases, yes. Holders of earlier rights may oppose conflicting applications within the statutory deadline, so the application and the grounds should be reviewed quickly.
Refusals may often be challenged before the competent appeal bodies and, in certain cases, further before the courts. The decision, the grounds and the deadlines must be reviewed first.
Keep the notification, note the date and seek a legal review before responding. The defense strategy depends on the grounds invoked and the evidence available on both sides.
In certain cases, yes — for example where earlier rights or other legal grounds are at issue, or where a mark has not been genuinely used. Each case requires a review of the registration and the evidence.
Yes. We can set up trademark watching so that potentially conflicting applications are identified while an opposition is still possible.
If you want to challenge a conflicting application or defend your own trademark before the DPPI or the courts, we can review the file and the deadlines and advise on the realistic options.
Share the essential facts so the firm can understand the matter and identify the appropriate next step.
Written matter enquiry
Share the facts, the current stage and the help you need. The firm will review the information before proposing the appropriate scope, fee and indicative timing.